dc.contributor.advisor |
Yousuf, Prof. Dr. Muhammad Abu |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Parveen, Shahnaz |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-08-14T12:31:44Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-08-14T12:31:44Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2011 |
|
dc.date.issued |
2011-06 |
|
dc.identifier.other |
ID 0000000 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12228/398 |
|
dc.description |
This thesis is submitted to the Department of Chemistry, Khulna University of Engineering & Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy in Chemistry, June 2011. |
en_US |
dc.description |
Cataloged from PDF Version of Thesis. |
|
dc.description |
Includes bibliographical references (pages 44-51). |
|
dc.description.abstract |
220 water samples of different Arsenic (As) -affected areas in Bangladesh have been
collected for analysis. Of them 58 samples were from Sagordari village of Jessore. 53 from
Koyra village of Kolaroa, 56 from Hajigong village of Chandpur and 53 from Arihazar
village of Narayangonj district. Various water quality parameters such as, p1-I,
conductivity, chloride, iron content, hardness and dissolved oxygen were analyzed using
standard analytical techniques. The suitability of investigated water for drinking and other
purposes was also analyzed comparing with standard values. As content for the 220
different water samples have been perceived in there different methods, i.e., Merck field
test kit, ARSOlux biosensor and ICP-MS methods. To find out an easy, low cost and
environmentally friendly method for As content in ground water three different methods
have been adopted. A comparison has been made among the three different test methods.
Effect of different water quality parameters on As test methods has been analyzed. The p1-I
range has been found to 6.2-8.1. It is seen that most of the samples i.e., 88.6% are alkaline
while those of 10.5% are acidic and only 0.9% are neutral in nature. It is seen that only
4.5% samples have conductivity values with in the limit of drinking water range. Rest of
the samples has high conductivity values. Of which 78.6% samples have the conductivity
(cy) values of 0.5<cy!~1 .0 mS/cm and 15.0% samples have that of abnormally high values.
The chloride values of the investigated 220 Tube-well (TW) water samples varied from
35.5 - 496.2 ppm. No health-based guideline value is proposed for chloride in drinkingwater.
Chloride concentrations in excess of about 250 ppm can give rise to detectable taste
inwater and not suitable for drinking. But the threshold depends upon the associated
cations.Consumers can, however, become accustomed to concentrations in excess of 250pm.
Only 10% samples have the chloride value beyond the mentioned value. In drinking
water,iron is seldom found at concentrations greater than 10 ppm. 220 TW water samples
havebeen investigated for the iron content and the results varied from 1.2 -
18.4ppm. No sample was found less than 0.3 ppm can cause water to turn a reddish brown color is the maximum permissible limit of iron for drinking purpose. Hardness is most commonly
Expressed as milligrams of calcium carbonate equivalent per liter or ppm, water containing
Less than 60 ppm generally being considered as soft. 220 1W water samples have been
Investigated for the determination of hardness. The average value of hardness is 0.74 ppm.
It is seen that the minimum value of hardness was found in Chandpur and Narayangonj
Districts and the value is 0.2 ppm while that of the maximum is 2.6 ppm in Jessore. It is
-4-
found that all the samples have hardness value with in drinking water range. 220 TW water
samples have been investigated for the determination of dissolved oxygen. The average
value of dissolved oxygen is 1.8 ppm. It is seen that the minimum value of dissolved
oxygen was found in Narayangonj district and the value is 1.3 ppm while that of the
maximum is 3.2 ppm in Chandpur district. The mentioned values of dissolved oxygen of
the investigated samples are quite permissible for the drinking purpose.
For As test, it is found that ARSOlux biosensor method is inexpensive, accurate, easy and
simple. On the other hand Merck field test kit method is expensive, unreliable and
environmentally problematic. Arsine gas is produced in Merck field test kit method is
environmentally hazardous and carcinogenic. But there is no environmental threat in
ARSOlux biosensor method. As test results by ARSOlux biosensor and ICP - MS methods
are very close to each other. ICP - MS method is accurate and reliable but expensive and
laboratory based while both ARSOlux biosensor method and Merck field test kit method
are mobile techniques. No Effects of different water quality parameters on As test methods
were unearthed |
en_US |
dc.description.statementofresponsibility |
Shahnaz Parveen |
|
dc.format.extent |
64 pages |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Khulna University of Engineering & Technology (KUET), Khulna, Bangladesh. |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Khulna University of Engineering & Technology (KUET) thesis/dissertation/internship reports are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. |
|
dc.subject |
Biotechnnology |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Arsenic Detection in Water. |
en_US |
dc.title |
Studies on Chemical Effect and Feasibility of Biosensor for Arsenic Detection in Water. |
en_US |
dc.type |
Thesis |
en_US |
dc.description.degree |
Master of Philosophy in Chemistry |
|
dc.contributor.department |
Department of Chemistry |
|